- Products
-
Solutions


Solutions Overview 



Application Portfolio Management 



Application Modernization 



Application Development 

-
Services


Services Overview 



Consulting 



Training 

-
Support


SupportLine Home 



My Details 



My Incidents 



Knowledgebase 



Product Updates 



Licensing 



Product Documentation 



Examples and Utilities 



Support Resources 



Community Forums 



Action Program 



Our Services 

-
Resources


Resource Center 



Customer Successes 



Executive Summaries 



White Papers 



Events 



Webcasts 



User Communities 



Newsletters 



Key Quotes 

-
About Micro Focus


Micro Focus Overview 



At-a-Glance 



Careers 



Investor Relations 



Corporate Responsibility 



Press Room 



Industry Analysts 



Contact Information 



Privacy Statement 



Legal 

Is Your Next Language COBOL? pt.1
The following article is with permission from Dr. Dobb’s Portal – The World of Software Development
September 18, 2008
Don't count Cobol out. It's a key element in modern distributed business software architectures.
In July, citing a budget shortfall, the Governor of California ordered the salaries of 170,000 State employees to be cut to the Federal minimum wage.
Not so fast, said the State Controller. Because California's payroll systems are written in antiquated Cobol code, it would take six months to implement the change and nine months to restore salaries later. That's if we had the Cobol programmers to do the job, which we don't, because you fired them last week, Governor. And we can't hire them back because nobody's going to take a pay cut from Social Security to program Cobol for minimum wage.
Government is our favorite spectator sport.
Blame Cobol
It may seem surprising that it takes any programming at all to implement a salary change in a payroll system, but a commenter on Slashdot said it was at least plausible, and that's good enough for us. What is not surprising is that Cobol would get blamed. Cobol is the most reviled programming language ever created.
On Dr. Dobb's CodeTalk blog this summer, Walter Bright said, "Programming languages are developed by programmers for programmers. This is as it should be. The last language developed for management was Cobol...I've never heard a nice word said about it."
There have been plenty of the other "kind" words spoken about this nearly 50-year-old language, though. The Turing Award-winning computer scientist Edsger Dijkstra famously said, "The use of Cobol cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense." Perl creator Larry Wall made his loathing more specific: "I knew I'd hate Cobol the moment I saw they'd used perform instead of do." Pulling no punches, the Jargon File informs us that Cobol is "a weak, verbose, and flabby language used by card wallopers to do boring mindless things on dinosaur mainframes," adding that Cobol is "synonymous with evil."
And it's no fun, either. "As a programming tool," Charles Petzold once said, "it has roughly the sex appeal of a wrench." Small wonder Cobol has few ardent enthusiasts. Pretty uncomfortable to be a Cobol programmer today, then, especially since "Cobol programmers are destined to code Cobol for the rest of their lives," as Bertrand Meyer has said, "and thereafter."
So if all that is true, isn't it strange that Cobol: 1) is the most widely used language in the 21st century; 2) is critical to some of the hottest areas of software development today; and 3) may be the next language you'll be learning?


